Tyrannosaurus imperator

Tyrannosaurus imperator was a proposed species of giant tyrannosaurid from the Late Cretaceous period of North America, originally suggested to have lived 2–3 million years before Tyrannosaurus rex. The name imperator (meaning “emperor”) was meant to reflect its larger, more robust build compared to T. rex, leading to speculation that it was an earlier form of the famous predator.

However, after further study, paleontologists determined that T. imperator was not a separate species at all. Instead, it was simply a robust variation of Tyrannosaurus rex, and the name is now considered a junior synonym of T. rex.

Physical Characteristics

According to the original proposal, T. imperator was supposed to be larger and more heavily built than T. rex. Estimated characteristics included:

• Length: 12–13 meters (39–43 feet)
• Weight: Up to 10,000 kg (22,000 lbs)
• Robust skull and skeleton, with particularly thick limb bones
• Two small incisiform teeth in the lower jaw, compared to the single one found in other Tyrannosaurus specimens

Despite these supposed differences, further analysis showed that these traits fall within the normal variation of Tyrannosaurus rex, with no clear evidence of a distinct species.

Diet and Feeding Habits

As a large apex predator, T. imperator (or rather, robust T. rex) would have hunted large herbivorous dinosaurs such as:

• Triceratops (ceratopsian prey)
• Edmontosaurus (large duck-billed dinosaurs)
• Ankylosaurs, though their armored bodies made them more difficult prey

Its massive bite force and bone-crushing teeth allowed it to eat almost every part of its prey, including bones. However, this was no different from T. rex.

Habitat and Distribution

The fossils identified as Tyrannosaurus imperator were found in the Hell Creek and Lance formations, which represent floodplain environments near the end of the Cretaceous period. These formations are the same ones that contain undisputed Tyrannosaurus rex fossils, further questioning whether T. imperator was truly a separate species.

Behavior and Social Structure

If Tyrannosaurus imperator had been real, it likely would have behaved similarly to T. rex:

• A dominant predator, hunting or scavenging as opportunities arose
• Possible intraspecific competition, with robust and gracile individuals representing different ecological roles or sexual dimorphism
• Strong sense of smell and vision, making it an effective hunter

However, since it was determined to be a robust form of T. rex, there is no reason to assume its behavior was different.

Discovery and Controversy

In 2022, Gregory S. Paul and colleagues proposed that Tyrannosaurus rex was actually three species:

1. Tyrannosaurus imperator – the oldest, most robust form, with two small incisiform teeth in the lower jaw.
2. Tyrannosaurus rex – the intermediate form.
3. Tyrannosaurus regina – a more gracile, “slender” form with only one small lower jaw incisor.

This hypothesis was based on differences in:

• Femur robustness (some specimens had thicker bones than others)
• Jaw and tooth structure
• Stratigraphic position (suggesting the forms lived at different times)

However, within a few months, many paleontologists strongly rejected this idea. A 2022 follow-up study by Thomas Carr and colleagues tested the same data and found:

• The differences in femur thickness fall within normal variation for a single species.
• The number of incisiform teeth varied even among individuals of the same “form”, meaning it was not a reliable diagnostic trait.
• The supposed stratigraphic separation was based on an oversimplified division of rock layers and did not hold up with more precise dating.

As a result, Tyrannosaurus imperator and Tyrannosaurus regina were quickly discarded as invalid species, and Tyrannosaurus rex remained the only recognized species.

Significance and Interesting Facts

• Tyrannosaurus imperator was proposed as a new species, but it was rejected in just a few months, one of the fastest reversals in dinosaur taxonomy.
• The “three-species hypothesis” was based on subtle variations that were later shown to be normal within a single species.
• This debate highlights how scientific scrutiny works—new ideas are proposed, tested, and sometimes rejected when the evidence does not support them.
• The robust and gracile forms of T. rex are now thought to be either individual variation, sexual dimorphism, or a result of different growth stages, rather than separate species.

Why Were Tyrannosaurus imperator and Tyrannosaurus regina Rejected?

The short-lived recognition of Tyrannosaurus imperator and Tyrannosaurus regina shows how scientific debate and peer review work in paleontology. The proposal was based on:

• Femur thickness differences, which turned out to be normal variation.
• Tooth number differences, which were inconsistent across specimens.
• Stratigraphic separation, which was based on an oversimplified rock layer analysis.

When these claims were tested, they did not hold up under scrutiny, and most paleontologists agreed that Tyrannosaurus rex remained a single species. Today, T. imperator and T. regina are considered invalid synonyms of Tyrannosaurus rex.

This debate also highlights an important principle in dinosaur research: just because a species shows variation does not mean it represents multiple species. Many animals today, including crocodiles, birds, and big cats, show similar variations in size and shape within a single species.

——————

There are no specific geographic coordinates for Tyrannosaurus imperator and Tyrannosaurus regina because:

1. They were never formally recognized as valid species, meaning no precise fossil site was designated specifically for them.
2. The fossils attributed to T. imperator and T. regina come from the same formations as Tyrannosaurus rex, primarily the Hell Creek Formation (Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota) and the Lance Formation (Wyoming).
3. These formations cover large geographic areas, and the specimens used in the 2022 study were from multiple locations, not a single, pinpointed fossil site.